Narrative interpretation of image architecture
We all know that Gotham is fictional. What do you do when you want to represent the big city scene? ? All CG is certainly possible, but director Nolan approaches adopted, is actually a bird’s eye directly to the Chicago transplant. The ambassador is not critical, just as a “Chicago City Fan”, I always feels strange. (Chicago is the birthplace of modern high-rise building, the official American Institute of Architects AIA rated as the most important city on the architectural significance of the United States, carving the tallest building in the city’s Sears Tower entrance foyer.)
But sometimes, I think the producer of the film really lacks the necessary architectural knowledge, so that the results it displays will be very crazy.
It uses the method of perspective to express this continuous space, and I personally guess it is the idea of a construction apprentice who just came out of the hut, which also has some merits. I would say the high purity color, when we consider the design of the space logic, neither conforms to the basic function of rationality, also cannot bring visual pleasure. Although the architectural space is not only the main point, at least it needs some effort, right? All in all , in my opinion the scenery in this movie which provide a very strange house, could you tell me the what it should express theme?
Although the layout is decent and the style is simple, it is helpless due to the position of the machine and the space. When it is forced to insert all kinds of objects that need to be accounted for, it seems very stretched. Look at it, are the placement of these trophies too casual? There is always a lack of refinement.
I believe that after my previous guidance, most of people has seen these basic architectural elements: Through tall floor-to-ceiling windows and the spread of the urban landscape. How to be luxury in the scenery? I don’t really need LV, I don’t need Ferrari. I always feel that in the movie, there are countless scenes changing and the architectural space is changing. This is the continuity of the director’s strength.
If you agree that Andy Warhol’s Empire State building is a narrative film, then you can open a window hole in the wall and the building will be narrative. The narrative is not that complicated. It seems that there has never been a clear definition of narrative in architecture, so that any design method that conveys information or contains intention can be interpreted as a narrative method.It can also be asked: is there any architectural design that does not convey information and does not contain intentions?Sometimes, when we can’t tell what a thing is, we can constantly explore what it isn’t to gradually define it. So, what architecture is strictly anti narrative?
But what I want to say is that it does not mean that narrative is of no value in itself. In some ways, narrative in architecture is a very common thing. Therefore, it may not be meaningful to discuss whether architecture has narrative nature. So how to narrate is the key point.
Yetta 